Appeals Process Paper Essay Sample free essay sample

When any suspect is found guilty. of any charge. is entitled to an entreaty to at least one degree of appellant tribunal ( Meyer A ; Grant. 2003 ) . An entreaty is when a suspect has already been found guilty in tribunal. and they decide to take it to a higher tribunal in order to alter the opinion ( Meyer A ; Grant. 2003 ) . Basically it is a procedure that takes topographic point. because the suspect and their lawyer do non experience that the finding of fact given was accurate ; and that could be due to many different grounds. Entreaties guarantee that there was a just test given and no rights were violated ( Meyer A ; Grant. 2003 ) . The entreaty procedure begins really shortly after the test. when the defence sends an entreaty to the tribunal. Entreaties factor in to the overall condemnable justness procedure. because in the terminal they can alter Torahs or amendments. The Miranda rights are a great illustration of this. We will write a custom essay sample on Appeals Process Paper Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page They came approximately after person went back and challenged the tribunal. It was so that the Miranda rights became portion of the jurisprudence and the condemnable justness procedure. Just because a felon goes to tribunal and is decided guilty and is charged with whatever he/she was being charged with. does non intend that the procedure is over and he/she accepts the sentence and it is done. The suspect may make up ones mind something went incorrect or he/she has a manner of turn outing their artlessness. Then they will subject an entreaty and may stop up acquiring out of the original sentence given. This wholly changes up the condemnable processs and procedures. Nothing is perfect. and our entreaties system could ever utilize betterment. The entreaties system is widely recognized for its high quality service. However. I do non truly experience that the current system is wholly equipped to manage all of the entreaties that are coming in. The figure of entreaties has increased enormously over the past 10 old ages. If the system is non changed up a small spot so we will stop up over tally with entreaties and it will take longer and longer to really acquire them taken attention of. Not to advert certain degree tribunals will stop up with more complex entreaties than they are comfy handling or are even use to managing and you do non desire people managing instances that are excessively complex for them to be covering with. So the entreaties procedure was put in topographic point in order to see that the suspect was given a just test and was non violated of any rights. An entreaty takes topographic point when a suspect was found guilty to the charges being pressed against him/her and he/she decides to take it to a higher appellant tribunal in order to seek and turn out their artlessness ( Meyer A ; Grant. 2003 ) . An entreaty is a great thing available to the individual being sentenced. because frequently times they are charged with something falsely and are sentenced to prison where they may pass their full life. The entreaty allows them a 2nd opportunity in tribunal to turn out their artlessness and acquire out of the sentence. However. it does non ever work and may even stop up bing him/her an even worse sentence. particularly if he/she had managed to lose a really rough sentence the first clip such as decease. This is how it affects the condemnable procedure and processs. The fact that it was designed by adult male is proof plenty that it is non a perfect procedure. though. There are plentifulness of ways that it could better and one of the chief ways is doing certain there are adequate people to manage them so it does non take drawn-out periods of clip for the entreaty to be taken attention of or really be brought to tribunal. If person is in a bad place and they should non be so they should non hold to be stuck in that place while waiting hebdomads or even months for the entreaty to be taken attention of. That. nevertheless. is merely one of many things that should be taken attention of to hone the entreaties procedure. It is. though. so a really valuable procedure. Mention Page Meyer. J. F. . A ; Grant. D. R. ( 2003 ) . The tribunals in our condemnable justness system. Upper Saddle River. New jersey: Prentice Hall.

An In-Depth Review of Star Reading Assessment Program

An In-Depth Review of Star Reading Assessment Program Star Reading is an online assessment program developed by Renaissance Learning for students typically in grades K-12. The program uses a combination of the cloze method and traditional reading comprehension passages to assess forty-six reading skills across eleven domains. The program is used to determine a student’s overall reading level as well as identify a students individual strengths and weaknesses. The program is designed to provide teachers with individual student data, quickly and accurately. It typically takes a student 10–15 minutes to complete an assessment, and reports are available immediately upon completion. The assessment consists of approximately thirty questions. Students are tested on foundational reading skills, literature components, reading informational text, and language. Students have one minute to answer each question before the program automatically moves them to the next question. The program is adaptive, so the difficulty will increase or decrease based on how a student performs. Features of Star Reading It is easy to set up and use. Star Reading is a Renaissance Learning program. This is important because if you have Accelerated Reader, Accelerated Math, or any of the other Star assessments, you only have to do the set up one time. Adding students and building classes is quick and easy. You can add a class of about twenty students and have them ready to be assessed in about 15 minutes.It correlates with Accelerated Reader. Many schools across the country use Accelerated Reader. To maximize the effect of Accelerated Reader, students should be limited to books that correlate to their specific Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Star Reading provides teachers with each student’s individual ZPD that can then be entered into the Accelerated Reader program to limit students to books that will not be too easy or too difficult for them to read.It is easy for students to use. The interface is plain and straightforward. This minimizes the chances for a student to be distracted. Student s have two choices when answering the multiple-choice-style questions. They can use their mouse and click on the correct choice, or they can use the A, B, C, D keys that correlate to the correct answer. Students are not locked into their answer until they click next or push the Enter key. Each question is on a one-minute timer. When a student has fifteen seconds remaining, a small clock will begin to flash at the top of the screen, letting them know that time is about to expire for that question. It provides teachers with a tool to easily screen and progress monitor students who need reading intervention. Star Reading comes with a screening and progress monitor tool that allows teachers to set goals and monitor a student’s progress as they move throughout the year. This easy-to-use feature allows teachers to quickly and accurately decide whether they need to change their approach with a particular student or continue doing what they are doing.It has an adaptable assessment bank. The program has an extensive assessment bank that allows students to be assessed multiple times without seeing the same question. In addition, the program adapts to the student as they answer questions. If a student is performing well, then the questions will increasingly become more difficult. If they are struggling, the questions will become easier. The program will eventually zero in on the student’s correct level. Useful Reports Star Reading is designed to provide teachers with useful information that will drive their instructional practices. It provides teachers with several useful reports designed to assist in targeting which students need intervention and what areas they need assistance in. Here are four key reports available through the program and a brief explanation of each: Diagnostic: This report provides the most information about an individual student. It offers information such as the student’s grade equivalent, percentile rank, estimated oral reading fluency, scaled score, instructional reading level, and zone of proximal development. It also provides tips to maximize that individual’s reading growth.Growth: This report shows the growth of a group of students over a specific period of time. This period of time is customizable from a few weeks to months, to even growth over the course of several years.Screening: This report provides teachers with a graph that details whether they are above or below their benchmark as they are assessed throughout the year. This report is useful because if students are falling below the mark, then the teacher needs to change their approach ​with that student.Summary: This report provides teachers with whole group test results for a specific test date or range. This is very useful for comparing mul tiple students at one time. Relevant Terminology Scaled Score (SS)  - The scaled score is figured based on the difficulty of the questions as well of the number of questions that were correct. Star Reading uses a scale range of 0–1400. This score can be used to compare students to each other as well as themselves over time.Percentile Rank (PR) - The percentile rank allows students to be compared to other students nationally that are in the same grade. For example, a student who scores in the 77th percentile scores better than 76% of students in their grade but lower than 23% of students in their grade.Grade Equivalent (GE) - The grade equivalent represents how a student performs compared to other students nationally. For example, a fifth-grade student who scores a grade equivalent of 8.3 scores as well as a student who is in the eighth grade and third month.Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) - This is the range of readability which a student should be required to select books. Reading in this range provides students with t he optimal opportunity to maximize reading growth. Books at this level are not too easy or too difficult for the student to read. ATOS  - A readability formula that uses average sentence length, average word length, vocabulary grade level, and the number of words to calculate the overall difficulty of a book. Overall Star Reading is a very good reading assessment program, especially if you already use the Accelerated Reader program. Its best features are that it is quick and easy to use for teachers and students, and reports can be generated in seconds. The assessment does rely too much on cloze reading passages. A truly accurate reading assessment would use a more balanced and comprehensive approach. However, Star is a great quick screening tool to identify struggling readers or individual reading strengths. There are better assessments available in terms of in-depth diagnostic assessments, but Star reading will give you a quick snapshot of where a student is at any given point.  Overall, we give this program 3.5 out of 5 stars, primarily because the assessment itself isn’t broad enough and there are times where consistency and accuracy are of concern.